Showing posts by Rachel Weisshaar.
-
NPR, National Geographic Explore Links Between People and Climate
›July 25, 2007 // By Rachel WeisshaarNational Public Radio (NPR) and National Geographic have teamed up to produce “Climate Connections,” a year-long series that explores, in its own words, “How we are shaping climate” and “How climate is shaping us.” This fascinating, first-rate series should appeal to non-experts as well as those more familiar with these issues.
NPR and National Geographic produce stories for the series independently, but link extensively to one another’s contributions. Both organizations’ websites offer a wealth of compelling—and sometimes sobering—stories on the connections between people and climate. For instance, NPR’s most recent “Climate Connections” story examines how the gas flares that are produced in the Niger Delta when oil companies burn off surplus natural gas are releasing vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the air and likely sickening nearby residents.
Both websites are filled with interactive features: National Geographic has a “Grade Your Climate IQ” quiz and an animated climate change simulation, while NPR’s website allows viewers to find past “Climate Connections” stories by navigating around a map of the world. I encourage you to listen in or log on to this excellent, cross-cutting series. -
A Hurricane’s Uneven Silver Lining
›July 10, 2007 // By Rachel WeisshaarIn October 1998, Hurricane Mitch devastated Choluteca, an impoverished province in rural Honduras. The hurricane claimed human lives and damaged homes, agriculture, and industry. But Mitch’s effect on Choluteca was unusual, because economic revitalization followed this destruction. The Washington Post recently detailed how investors and developers have seized on Choluteca’s advantageous location—between El Salvador and Nicaragua, and close to the Pan-American Highway and a Pacific seaport—to transform it from an underdeveloped agricultural region into a hub for international trade.
So far, Honduran entrepreneurs have achieved considerable success in the region, finding foreign backers to invest in new high-tech melon and shrimp processing plants. Choluteca’s formerly sleepy capital has become a bustling town, attracting businesspeople with expensive tastes, as well as symbols of American capitalism: the local Wendy’s is packed every day for lunch.
Some ordinary farmers and workers’ lives have improved since the hurricane. For instance, the influx of post-hurricane foreign aid provided many working-class people with better houses than the ones the hurricane destroyed—the floors in their new homes are made of cement, rather than dirt. However, the gap between the rich and the poor has not narrowed since the hurricane. In fact, for the most part, it has widened.
The continuing poverty of the majority of Cholutecans will likely be exacerbated by plans for a new free-trade zone, nicknamed “Zip Choluteca.” This spring, the Honduran government and developers signed an agreement to keep wages below the legal daily minimum for 5 to 10 years, in an effort to make this economically underdeveloped region more attractive to investors and entrepreneurs.
Although natural disasters cause great damage to societies and individuals, they are not always as disastrous in the long run as we might think. Natural disasters can revitalize economies, as in Choluteca, and can encourage peace, as in Aceh after the 2004 Asian tsunami. Yet economic success in Choluteca can only truly be accomplished if the Cholutecans whose work fuels the region’s growth benefit adequately from their labors. -
UN Highlights Climate Change-Security Link in Sudan
›June 26, 2007 // By Rachel WeisshaarUN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon recently named climate change as one of the primary causes of the current humanitarian crisis in Sudan. Although most commentators focus on the political and ethnic dimensions of the conflict, Ban reminds us that herders (primarily Arabs) and farmers (primarily black Africans) coexisted peacefully until the mid-1980s, when drought struck the region.
Ban believes that peacekeeping is an important first step in alleviating the crisis, and he expressed hope that Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir will stand by his recent agreement to allow a joint United Nations-African Union peacekeeping force into Darfur. However, Ban maintains that a more permanent solution to this conflict must address its underlying environmental factors. As he starkly stated, any lasting solution will have to tackle “the fact that there’s no longer enough good land to go around.” Ban’s piece draws on an Atlantic Monthly article (available to subscribers only) by Stephen Faris. In March, The New Security Beat’s Karin Bencala weighed in on Faris’ article.
Also, a new report by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) states that environmental degradation—particularly desertification, deforestation, and overgrazing—has helped contribute to decades of conflict in Sudan. The report predicts that environmental stresses will precipitate future conflicts—particularly in Africa’s Sahel region and in east Asia, as UNEP executive director Achim Steiner said in an interview. The report also echoes Ban’s long-term environmental perspective on restoring peace to Sudan. “Investment in environmental management, financed by the international community and from the country’s emerging boom in oil and gas exports, will be a vital part of the peace building effort,” says UNEP’s press release.
Economic development is a necessary part of any solution in Darfur, but in order to achieve stability, this development must preserve, not deplete, Sudan’s already-overtaxed natural resources. Sudan cannot solve its environmental and resource problems without the help of those countries that likely helped cause them: unless countries with the highest levels of carbon dioxide emissions—the United States and China, among others—do not reduce their carbon footprint, even the most far-sighted Sudanese development strategy will be hard-pressed to succeed.
